Hi Quillon,
Thank you for the heads up! I took a quick peek at the FluidEarth and its background, and thought the "
OpenMI - Why should I use it" and the (unfortunately timely in light of the recent events)
Abingdon case study were good starting points in terms of motivation.
So if I understood correctly, FluidEarth makes it much easier to let different models interact on much more fine-grained level than would be possible using workflows based on using output files of "first batch" of simulations as inputs the the second, third etc?
I also thought it was worth noting that the license used is from the "free end" of Open Source (BSD)!